“The most important decision we make is whether we believe we
live in a friendly or a hostile universe.”
-- Albert Einstein
There is
power in understanding interests. The more clearly you understand the other
side’s concerns, the better able you will be to afford merit to their reason
for taking their position. Look for intangible or hidden interests that may be
important before judging that person negatively. With concrete interests like
money, for example, ask what lies behind them.
A
HYPOTHETICAL:
Consider
the restaurant owner who is trying to operate efficiently as a business should,
while maintaining excellent food product and superior service to his
patrons...all while affording jobs to many in his community. The issue of
Obamacare is going to impact him in a way he deems negative. He has checked the
facts, trusted his intuition, sought reason, and come to the conclusion that
Obamacare will cost him hundreds of thousands of dollars more a year to operate
his business in order to insure his staff and this will force him to pass the
cost on to his patrons, something he fears doing for he does not want to risk
losing business – or cutting his employee payroll in half. These are valid
concerns and one must give merit to his reason for taking his stand against
Obamacare.
Now consider the employee of said restaurant.
An employee who works hard and in the economy truly values having a job at all
but needs a job where he and his family are insured for health care. This
employee has a child and that child needs special medical attention – possibly
for the remainder of his life. How would this employee ever afford such medical
attention were it not for the options Obamacare ensures this family? This
employee has checked the facts, used his intuition, sought reason for making
his decision to support Obamacare. This employee has a valid concern and one
must give merit to his reason for taking his stand in support of Obamacare.
WHO IS
RIGHT AND WHO IS WRONG?
The
point is that what is MOST important to the restaurant owner may be in direct
opposition with what is MOST important to the employee. Rather than hating one
another for taking opposing views, they must empathize with one another, giving
merit to each other's reasons for their opposing stands. It would be foolish
for the restaurant owner not to be concerned about his business in light of the
impact paying more to the government will make – would it not? It would also be
foolish for the employee not to be concerned about affording the healthcare his
child will need – would it not?
So
remember to consider interests before negatively judging for the stand that
person takes on any issue, especially one so heated as Obamacare has become.
Understand that behind every hateful remark made is a human being whose life is
not as yours is, whose needs may differ greatly from yours, and whose position
may be in direct opposition from yours – but not without merit for his reason
in taking that position.
We all
know – and love – "the restaurant owner." We all know – and love – "the employee." Let’s think about another’s world view before we negatively judge them or their decision
to oppose you or yours.
Educate
and relate...do not hate. Love never claims, it ever gives; love never suffers, never resents, never revenges itself. Where there is love there is life; hatred leads to destruction.
Thoughts?
The employee cannot bargain for sincere appreciation from his boss: “I’ll give you two sentences of understanding if you’ll give me four words of praise.” Nor can he force his boss to appreciate him: “Give me empathy three times daily or else I’m leaving the restaurant.” If the boss expresses appreciation because it was asked for, the employee will probably wonder whether the boss is being sincere. This is why we should each 1) check the facts, 2) use our own intuition, and 3) use our own reason in making the decisions about what is most important to us -- not because the media, a church leader, a banker, a "friend"/someone bullied us. The forced ranking you do each and every day is YOURS and YOURS alone. It must be or you live an unauthentic life -- no one wants that.
ReplyDeleteTHINK. Let's say you have a dear loved one who is reliant on government assistance, and after having 1) checked the facts, 2) trusted your own intuition, and 3) used your own reason, you determine it a fool's choice to support a candidate who will cut the funds that support the programs that care for your dear loved one. Who could not find merit in your reason for making your choice as such -- even if they do not support the same candidate?
ReplyDelete